On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:33:05 +0100, Roy Culley wrote:
> begin risky.vbs
> <13u4ndekljutl.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:19:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> 2006: The year that changed Linux
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| I've been saying for years that Linux was well along on its way
>>>| from being the tech fanboy operating system of choice, to becoming
>>>| one of big business' favorite operating systems. Well, I was right
>>>| all along, but in 2006, that progress smacked many Linux fans in
>>>| the face.
>>>|
>>>| This is my list of the five most significant changes in Linux this
>>>| year. They are not changes, however, that many who have embraced
>>>| Linux in the past will appreciate. Like it or lump it, these are
>>>| the changes that I also think clearly predict Linux's future in
>>>| the mainstream.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS3934100436.html
>>
>> I notice you didn't quote this part:
>>
>> "While these were the major Linux stories of 2006, as I look back at
>> the year as a whole, I sense that all this plays into a larger
>> story: there are growing signs that the Linux community itself is
>> forking."
>
> And you, FUD meister omitted this, from the same paragraph you
> partially quoted:
>
> But, at the same time, Linux is going to grow to new heights in
> popularity both for individual and business users.
Those are fluff words with nothing to back them up.
> How pathetic you are.
Actually Culley, you're the pathetic one around COLA.
Quite sad in fact.
|
|
