On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:51:40 +0000, Mark Kent wrote:
> begin oe_protect.scr
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Tuesday 19 December 2006 12:24 \__
>>
>>> begin oe_protect.scr
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Tuesday 19 December 2006 08:25 \__
>>>>
>>>>> begin oe_protect.scr
>>>>> Maverick <Sun@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>> Linonut wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On 2006-12-18, spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>The reason it was better back then was because there were some damned
>>>>>>>>>good people here who left in disgust at all the wintrolls dragging the
>>>>>>>>>newsgroup down. We've not seen hide nor hair of several of them for
>>>>>>>>>several years.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Only person who springs instantly to mind right now is terry porter
>>>>>>>>>but there was more than that of course.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Terry Porter was one of the ones who started the current mess, by
>>>>>>>>applying a Linux loyalty test to posters. Long time Linux advocates,
>>>>>>>>who had been in the group, advocating Linux far longer than he had been
>>>>>>>>here, would be accused by him of being wintrolls if they admitted to
>>>>>>>>any Linux problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not in my recollection.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Timmy is just spreading a peculiar kind of COLA busting technique. The
>>>>>> guy is a first class nerd without a life.
>>>>>> If he ever had a woman, he'd be gone from here in a heartbeat.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hehe.. probably. Terry Porter was an advocate of the highest quality
>>>>> and morals. One has to wonder about the morals of anyone who'd
>>>>> deliberately post anti-charter material week in and week out for
>>>>> years...
>>>>
>>>> I decided to expose and face up that MVP who submits thousands of
>>>> Microsoft items to Digg.com. I'll find out tomrrow if he replies or simply
>>>> retaliates by modding me down, as usual...
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think that you should face up to such people in these situations. All
>>> too often, people use arguments about manners and similar in an effort
>>> to distract from embarrassing but important facts, such as they've just
>>> lost the argument, say, but it's not "what you say", it becomes "how you
>>> said it".
>>>
>>> Don't give up!
>>
>> Thanks, Mark. You make some good points. Some of these Digg stalkers (I'm not
>> really exaggerating here) remind me of linux-sux-lycos, who has just
>> returned to this newsgroup. Like Gary+++, perhaps he's back on this time of
>> the month when he's on heavy tampon shuffle. Whether others know it or not,
>> he chose nyms that are colleagues and people whom I know. Perhaps he's
>> trying to get attention (mine or /theirs/) in this way, as well as lead them
>> to pressuring me or be upset at me. The only thing worse than a troll is an
>> anonymous coward. The latter has no liability issues, so it's a criminal on
>> the loose.
>>
>
> That is seriously sociopathic behaviour. Such people should probably be
> locked up somewhere. If you think someone is doing such a thing, I
> would suggest that you point it out, for the record, immediately,
> ideally in a follow-up to the first offending post. That way, the
> normal people will know who to avoid.
You two are loony toons of the highest order!
Do you guys actually go back and read what you write?
Roy seems to like to aggravate people, like the police for example, and
then cry foul when they don't give him the answers/results he expects.
He has to have the final word and is always right while everybody else is
wrong.
Classic narcissistic behavior.
Mark Kent is just a fool who is obsessed with Linux and Roy.
Not necessarily in that order.
Willy Poaster is a legend in his own mind.
Oh, BTW if you're dragging up linux-sux-lycos you guys are obviously
chatting offline, possibly even dating, because that's a real blast from
the past that was here long before Roy was ever hatched.
|
|
