In article <i8q2g0c3x2uh$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Digg's ranking system is far more accurate, and it rates you:
>
> http://digg.com/users/schestowitz/profile
>
> Overall 39, with 9,340 diggs for 1,198 stories. That's an average of less
> than 9 diggs per story, with only 178, or 15% making it to the front page.
Actually, that's way better than he's doing at Netscape. At Netscape,
97 have made it to the front page, out of 5159. That's 1.9 %.
For comparison, here's what a good Navigator can do:
Neophile: 430 out of 1132 38.0 %
Ousama: 410 out of 741 55.3 %
TimALoftis: 896 out of 1902 47.1 %
msaleem: 461 out of 1039 44.4 %
Aidenag: 106 out of 281 37.7 %
capn_caveman: 407 out of 904 45.0 %
Sure beats 1.9%.
and how about some people who are NOT paid Navigators?
charbarred: 50 out of 273 18.3%
STONERS: 97 out of 139 69.8 %
worker: 257 out of 590 43.6 %
luvmyprez: 118 out of 138 85.5 % (and 9140 comments!)
I wonder if Netscape pays Navigators by submissions, or by how the
stories perform?
--
--Tim Smith
|
|
