In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:49:35 +0000
<10615457.2m6z6FVcti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> http://www.hatevista.com/
>
> Self-explanatory, I think.
Microsoft IIS6-hosted? My brain hurts.
$ wget --server-response http://www.hatevista.com
--08:35:33-- http://www.hatevista.com/
=> `index.html'
Resolving www.hatevista.com... 68.178.232.99
Connecting to www.hatevista.com|68.178.232.99|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:35:35 GMT
Content-Length: 21521
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Expires: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:35:35 GMT
Cache-Control: no-cache
Connection: keep-alive
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
Pragma: no-cache
Via: 1.1 netcache01inhq (NetCache NetApp/5.5R4)
Length: 21,521 (21K) [text/html]
100%[====================================>] 21,521 --.--K/s
08:35:35 (266.92 KB/s) - `index.html' saved [21521/21521]
The actual index.html has a lot of carriage return/linefeed sequences
(but, strangely enough, not all of them) and an embedded style sheet.
There are also a number of HTML errors such as missing semicolons
for ' '.
Not nearly as bad as some of the other pages I've seen, but a little
sloppy.
[rest snipped]
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux. Because it's there and it works.
Windows. It's there, but does it work?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
