Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> cc wrote:
>
> >
> > 7 wrote:
> >> cc wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> >> >> Why Linux will always be better.
> >> >>
> >> >> ,----[ Quote ]
> >> >> | Yep that's right. Linux will always be better. Even the latest
> >> >> | offering of windows vista still doesn't cut it against linux and
> >> >> | the other *nix type operating systems. It (vista) is still a
> >> >> | reaction and an attempt at catchup to the linux operating system.
> >> >> `----
> >> >>
> >> >> http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/linux/locutus/archives
> >> why-linux-will-always-be-better-13499
> >> >
> >> > When are the OSS apps going to catch up?
> >>
> >> Call me when windopz networking is faster than Linux running Samba.
> >
> > I don't have your number.
>
> You don't need it.
> You are requested to call him when windows is *faster* doing networking
Joking Petey, joking. In one of my earlier posts here I mentioned how
much slower .Net in particular is for network traffic. Also he said to
call when windopz networking is faster, which I'm pretty sure doesn't
exist. So what if I tune my own Linux distro for networking speed and
call it windopz?
|
|
