Guy Fawkes wrote:
> Cairo is dead but a contemporary story would be that Microsoft is
> promising a 'modular' version of Windows (whatever that means, but I guess
> that they consider Windows 'finished' and that they only need to update
> parts of it now and then). I wouldn't be surprised if a future version of
> Windows looks very much like Mac OS X, being based on BSD and therefore
> compatible with the 'industry standard' Linux, more or less.
They also remaindered the WinFS filesystem.
And why wouldn't they? It poses a direct challenge to their DBMS sales.
--
Texeme Construct
http://you-read-it-here-first.com
|
|
