Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Schestowitz (Linux) vs. flatfish (Windows)

  • Subject: Re: Schestowitz (Linux) vs. flatfish (Windows)
  • From: Hadron Quark <qadronhuark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:10:04 +0100
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:jqzf/yelQk+kQ3sxdvTPA9SdKeY=
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <doSdnb-qVL5RqR3YnZ2dnUVZ_oGlnZ2d@speakeasy.net>
  • User-agent: Gnus
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:469052
John Bailo <jabailo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Schestowitz(Linux)
>
> Reliable
> Uses data and fact to make logical points
> Always on duty 24x7
> Stable...not easily rattled

This is clearly a different Roy than the one who spams this newsgroup.

Our Roy threatens people with castration when he has his little hissy fits.

>
>
> flatfish (Windows)
>
> Volatile and paranoid...many GPFs during normal use
> Changes "names" frequently, hides behind aliases...must have broken
> filesystem
> Easily upset by facts that violate his warped view of reality...cannot
> resolve dependency issues

-- 
A word to the wise: a credentials dicksize war is usually a bad idea
on the net.
		-- David Parsons in c.o.l.development.system, about coding in C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index