Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Schestowitz (Linux) vs. flatfish (Windows)

  • Subject: Re: Schestowitz (Linux) vs. flatfish (Windows)
  • From: Hadron Quark <qadronhuark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:14:13 +0100
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:weC0yZ8N+NjfkbhNSCBuvQSzwuY=
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <doSdnb-qVL5RqR3YnZ2dnUVZ_oGlnZ2d@speakeasy.net> <20061213182132.2674b5cf@ed-desktop>
  • User-agent: Gnus
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:469053
ed <ed@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:14:13 -0800
> John Bailo <jabailo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Schestowitz(Linux)
>> 
>> Reliable
>> Uses data and fact to make logical points
>> Always on duty 24x7
>> Stable...not easily rattled
>> 
>> 
>> flatfish (Windows)
>> 
>> Volatile and paranoid...many GPFs during normal use
>> Changes "names" frequently, hides behind aliases...must have broken 
>> filesystem
>> Easily upset by facts that violate his warped view of
>> reality...cannot resolve dependency issues
>
> heh, lol, best post ever, x1000 :)
>
> nice work john

Get a tissue and wipe it off your face ed. Your post is certainly the
most embarassing, nauseous ass kissing I have ever witnessed x1000.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index