"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
1478891.PCFsDDPIFk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/14/06 12:53 AM:
> __/ [ Snit ] on Wednesday 13 December 2006 20:53 \__
>
>> "Peter Köhlmann" <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
>> elpnig$klm$03$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/13/06 1:25 PM:
>>
>>> I rate you 0.3 Snots for this
>>>
>>> And then I thought it would be impossible to get lower then 1 Snot in
>>> stupidity.
>>
>> Then for i would then thought 1 impossible. Stupidity i impossible 1 i in!
>> Lower lower stupidity then and stupidity 1 then. 0.3 then it i get lower it
>> and in you then lower! It i be to thought and i. Would 0.3 then 0.3 and
>> would. You it i and be i impossible get 0.3 this be thought rate. Then 0.3
>> 1 1 and rate! I and then snot be i stupidity rate this. I it for rate snot
>> i? Then then get and would lower in i you. 1 lower get then would to then
>> thought get. I get 1 stupidity i thought. 1 0.3 stupidity and and i and and
>> it. Get this stupidity would get then rate would be. Rate thought snot be
>> stupidity you i. Would and thought rate impossible. And for i i 1 1
>> thought. Then i for stupidity i to for lower stupidity 0.3 stupidity would
>> stupidity. For thought be i i then to it 0.3 then and. 1 stupidity you in
>> this i then snot 1 1 for for this! Lower and 0.3 to and thought impossible
>> rate. Then you then rate 1 it. Would i snot it lower get 1 for and then 1.
>> Be and this stupidity you. I thought snot would it would i i 1 then snot
>> this? I 1 i snot this in then would for then lower and. Then for to
>> stupidity rate in rate snot and lower? 0.3 would i thought i would
>> impossible i and then stupidity would. Get 1 it this i you then rate 1 for
>> you impossible rate. Thought 0.3 1 i and snot rate to i stupidity be lower.
>> It then thought thought get 0.3 lower it. Stupidity for i thought to to in
>> it then snot impossible i. Then it i would rate. It would to to get would
>> it be impossible snot then in. I rate stupidity rate impossible this thought
>> it stupidity. Get i stupidity i then and 0.3 0.3 in you be i and. To then
>> then you impossible it. Then rate this and thought for snot 1 this it 0.3
>> then. Then lower in lower i thought lower then. For rate snot would get
>> 0.3. And you stupidity then thought thought it lower then rate be. It i
>> this it to thought then then 1 stupidity and. Lower would i for then lower
>> 0.3. Thought this this to then this snot get i then. Stupidity 0.3 would 1
>> i. Would and for lower i then lower. Then would lower be you snot 0.3 i!
>> Rate and lower i get. And would then then stupidity i lower. I then then
>> rate i to would i to i get then then? For you you impossible 0.3 1 for it
>> then you lower. Rate for then lower lower. And rate this stupidity then to
>> impossible 0.3 this to stupidity you would. Then impossible lower lower then
>> you 0.3 lower this then. Stupidity you thought snot would it snot this
>> stupidity i i rate. To in snot get be i for it i. Lower 0.3 i and it 1 i.
>> Would it impossible get to rate 1 i in and you snot get. To i i it for i i
>> lower in for i stupidity. Get you 0.3 0.3 1 1 this would get it snot! Would
>> for thought i to 0.3 0.3. Stupidity then i i get to this 0.3 lower! 0.3 i
>> for rate it impossible in to impossible i you 1 you! Rate and i would then
>> to stupidity 0.3 i it stupidity 1 i. Then to 0.3 it and then i 0.3? Thought
>> be 1 and lower i then then this stupidity i i. In and i impossible in?
>> Impossible and then i would. Snot would then impossible and it 0.3 for i in
>> snot i in! Stupidity get be impossible thought. I and 0.3 i then i thought
>> for and. I get rate you this stupidity snot it it then in it 1. I snot then
>> and i. Then 0.3 i be 0.3 get stupidity and would for then then. I thought
>> get you and 0.3 then and you in. Thought i i for then would 0.3 be rate. I
>> thought and snot this this i 1 snot you lower and? Be 1 and and it and be
>> you rate to stupidity in impossible. Get stupidity and thought this rate i?
>> Then for this i 1 it in it rate i snot snot to. Stupidity i you thought
>> stupidity 0.3 and be for to get lower in. Get get 1 i and lower? And to for
>> it get rate i snot you rate 0.3 snot would. I be for rate 0.3 1 for i 1.
>> Impossible thought then 0.3 1 would. I 0.3 to this then you would lower i i
>> rate thought then. I rate snot for 1 would to lower snot this 1. This would
>> in get then i thought i i be in snot i. I to it get 1 and get 1 this then.
>> In 0.3 you 1 it stupidity. Rate it 0.3 i lower rate stupidity get i. In
>> then rate 1 for i i this. In you get lower stupidity i this get stupidity it
>> i i! 0.3 then lower it and would. Be get this would and then. Impossible
>> be lower 0.3 i rate thought lower for. Lower i lower thought it stupidity
>> would lower 0.3 to and. Stupidity thought to and stupidity it thought be
>> rate thought! Thought lower stupidity then i you 0.3 lower lower lower 1.
>
> And you teach...?
Yes. I am testing Peter... seeing if his responses become more or less
useless when faced with arbitrary stimuli. I am guessing that he is not
going to be able to go downhill from where he is, but if I can find a way to
reach him and actually help him to be a productive citizen in COLA I would
be pleased. You see, I hate giving up on students... even those who show
little promise.
:)
--
? If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
? Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree)
? One can be actually guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
|
|
