On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:58:31 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ Kier ] on Saturday 23 December 2006 10:05 \__
>
>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:40:26 +0000, Ian Semmel wrote:
>>
>>> Says it
>
>
> Ian, that's just trolling. Why can't you play nice?
Err...because he *is* a wintroll?
>> Says what? You're saying very little of value. The fact that XUbuntu
>> exists and is being used by many people is evidence that it's wanted by
>> users. The 'buntu variations are all nice easy ways of getting a
>> particular environment, well-integrated with the distro.
>
>
> It also suits legacy hardware. Xubuntu would probably work with some
> 10-year-old laptops which are otherwise just a brick in the drawer.
--
On the 12th day of Christmas, M$ gave to me....
12 patches patching,
11 apps screwed up,
10 more vulnerabilities,
9 google searches,
8 phone support calls,
7 blast & dammits,
6 hours downloading
5 REEEE-BOOOTS!
4 Oh, fucks!
3 Bloody hells,
2 defrags
& a clusterfuck of a windows OS!
|
|
