"Ray Ingles" <sorceror@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnebns3t.51m.sorceror@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 2006-07-17, billwg <billw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> You cannot point to a single "lie" as you guy like to call anything
>> favorable to MS.
>
> Well, *you're* favorable to MS, and you're lying there.
>
> For example, one of the studies talks about how a supposedly all-Linux
> shop was severely hampered by the Blaster worm - which only affects
> Windows. Certainly there's *something* wrong there - either it wasn't
> an
> all-Linux shop or else it wasn't affected by the Blaster worm. QED.
> So,
> the first part of your statement is false.
>
I'm sure you saw that somewhere, ray, but it doesn't seem to be in any
of the papers referenced in the MS ad. Are you getting confused in your
old age?
> The second part, which (paraphrased) claims that "you guy [sic] like
> to
> call anything favorable to MS" "a lie" is equally false. It may *feel*
> that way to you, since you lie quite often, but it's not true.
>
Well, I'm just referencing COLA posts, ray.
>> What you dweebs never seem to get around to showing is any situation
>> where linux is the obvious choice.
>
>
Got a cite? LOL!!!
|
|
