On 2006-07-14, Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:38:50 -0500, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:15:33 +0200, Johan Lindquist wrote:
>>
>>> So anyway, it was like, 02:44 CEST Jul 13 2006, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
>>> Erik Funkenbusch was all like, "Dude,
>>>
>>>> See, even Steven knows to get permission before posting comments
>>>> from a private email. I'm really sure you got his permission. Right?
>>>> Should I check?
>>>
>>> You didn't hesitate to go ahead and contact the other party without
>>> even bothering to check with Roy first if he had permission to use
>>> those images last time you had an itch, what's really stopping you
>>> this time?
>>
>> Because I don't have to. Roy's silence is admission that he did not.
>
> Um, how's that go again? Roy's 'silence' is an admission of nothing
> whatsoever. He has no obligation to reply to *you*. That's just
> bollocks. You're being a real twerp, Erik, and fast losing the small crumb
> of respect I did have for you.
I'm glad you said it's _your_ respect he's losing. I started to jump on
it until I noticed that one little word.
He has /no/ respect with anyone else. Except maybe DuFS.
--
Linux: A culture of repair.
Windows: A culture of despair.
|
|