Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: I apologize for ever posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy

  • Subject: Re: I apologize for ever posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • From: B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:06:40 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc
  • References: <44c59a19@news.usenetzone.com> <44c59ca2@news.usenetzone.com>
  • User-agent: KNode/0.9.0
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1132318 comp.os.linux.misc:627901
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 05:02 Les Walton wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:52:07 -0400, Les Walton wrote:
> 
> Sorry, I forgot to include my original message.
> here it is.
> And for whatever it is worth I tried Linux for 4 and 1/2 weeks/give or
> take a few days, before reaching my conclusions.
> It's funny how people create entire threads based upon what they think
> other people mean when they say something.

Ah - thanks for that flattie - I really didn't think that you'd have the
sheer brass neck to re-incarnate Les walton to "prove" your couple of weeks
theory.
I didn't like to point out to you that the only person who *knew* that "a
couple" in the original was 4 or 5 would be the "OP", because you seemed to
be so sure.... in fact it was as though.......:-)

Also, congratulations are in order.
You are now well on the way to "proving" (given the next lot of stats) that
*you* and the other trolls get more replies than "all of Roy's posts put
together....", right?:-)

Cheers compton (left your x-post in this time, btw)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index