Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Linspire

  • Subject: Re: Linspire
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 17:14:15 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <WlqdnRZ1vNbgCODZSa8jmw@karoo.co.uk> <pan.2006.05.31.14.41.07.181701@nomail.com> <pan.2006.05.31.17.18.34.153675@linuxmail.org> <pan.2006.05.31.17.49.07.609572@nomail.com> <OVrfg.7878$l8.6063@newsfe6-win.ntli.net> <1149129490.655723.56930@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <pan.2006.06.01.03.57.19.230256@linuxmail.org> <61tfg.9541$m7.9523@newsfe7-win.ntli.net> <127sofrnsh84le3@news.supernews.com> <6Ctfg.2890$s4.1780@newsfe3-win.ntli.net> <1vq2l3-9bh.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk> <4632853.p1hFGePTTn@schestowitz.com> <SjBfg.6453$EX2.3293@bignews5.bellsouth.net>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ DFS ] on Thursday 01 June 2006 13:46 \__

     ^^^^^

>> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Thursday 01 June 2006 11:09 \__
> 
>>> There's a fear factor around amongst the MCSE folks that the improved
>>> reliability and security of Linux means that many of them will lose
>>> their jobs.
> 
> 
> Where's some evidence of this claim?

See carets.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index