Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Google raise the question of affiliate sites

  • Subject: Re: Google raise the question of affiliate sites
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:28:16 +0100
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <ctit725g6ctdkc46n36b218i9irc5ff5om@4ax.com> <1149168798.973662.160950@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ canadafred ] on Thursday 01 June 2006 14:33 \__

> 
> Big Bill wrote:
>> This has been added to the guidelines;
>> "
>> Avoid "doorway" pages created just for search engines, or other
>> "cookie cutter" approaches such as affiliate programs with little or
>> no original content.
>> If your site participates in an affiliate program, make sure that your
>> site adds value. Provide unique and relevant content that gives users
>> a reason to visit your site first.
>> "
<
> Yep and they're gettin' their arses booted out of the SERPs faster than
> ... well, you don't need to know the analogy going on in my head.
> 
> Hey! Maybe it's time for a new anagram? Better start digging it out.
> Ya' ya' I know, lay off ...
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bong

Is that an affiliated page for the post? 

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      | Useless fact: There are five regular polyhedra
http://Schestowitz.com  |     GNU/Linux     ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  6:25am  up 35 days 12:57,  16 users,  load average: 0.45, 0.72, 0.82
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index