__/ [ Paul ] on Friday 02 June 2006 16:46 \__
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:18:28 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>__/ [ Paul ] on Friday 02 June 2006 14:44 \__
>>
>>> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:17:14 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>__/ [ Paul ] on Friday 02 June 2006 12:21 \__
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:04:16 GMT, "Pet @ www.gymratz.co.uk ;¬)"
>>>>> <PeTe33@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> (rather not say, someone must be eavesdropping).
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's the site I am thinking of, and if you are referring to google
>>>>> about eavesdropping, then it's too late as it has PR. :)
>>>>
>>>>Don't worry. It'll be dropped next time Big Daddy runs out of space.
>>>>*wink*
>>>
>>> That will be tomorrow then ;)
>>
>>Just wrote about it (minutes ago), including links to article which I
>>believe explain it all.. in case you are interested...
>>
>>
http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/06/02/googles-big-daddy/
>>
>>Maybe Google should just buy MSN's search engine. It will earn them some
>>storage space and eliminate the competition that IE7's search bar will
>>otherwise bring.
>>
>>Best wishes,
>>
>>Roy
>
> I am not convinced about some of the theories going around.
>
> 301 / 302 - don't use them
> duplicate content - nope.
> broken links - nope
> affiliate - nope
> IBLs - plenty of.
Same here; with the exception of my own UseNet posts, which other sites
mirror (including Google Groups that is now listed among Web results
*gasp*). Dmitri said that the www appendage, of which I was a sufferer,
could have an impact, but that was at the earlier stages when uncertainty
loomed.
> I have noticed that for the last 4 days or so that DC 64.233.179.99
> has come into the fold along with the other three. (see earlier post)
> but nothing else with the other DCs.
I have just tried this IP, but the cache results I get from that datacentre
are consistent with the rest. Boy, I miss that Google juice. Meanwhile, I
just drink some black instant coffee (not just a timely phrase). Google
Images serves me better than ever before (more images referrlas than text
referrlas), whilst other referrals are down to a quarter of what they used
to be. Yahoo and MSN are on the rise in my case, so not all is poo. *sips
coffee*
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | #FFFFFFF4 ADD &R1, "9999999", &BankAccount
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
5:25pm up 35 days 23:57, 10 users, load average: 0.07, 1.15, 1.74
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
