__/ [ tonnie ] on Monday 05 June 2006 20:49 \__
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> __/ [ Paul ] on Monday 05 June 2006 19:06 \__
>>
>>> On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:07 GMT, "Georgie" <filmfind@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> My site www.ring-tones.us was banned about Febuary 2005, there was no
>>>> results in Google for site:www.ring-tones.us and the PR dropped to 0.
>>>>
>>>> Now the PR is 1. This means my site's ban has been lifted, does it not.
>>> The way I see it, yes.
>>
>>
>> I concur with Paul.
>>
>>
>>> If it was greyed out, then you should worry.
>>
>>
>> Not necessarily. Google is broken. *wink* Well, not toolbar PageRank,
>> _yet_.
>
> Toolbar Pagerank has been broken from day 1, it never showed the true
> PR. It was merely there to give the boy's something to play with.
No, that's pr0n.
>>>> There's still no results for the site: search but it's only one page
>>>> anyway.
>>> You won't have results. All it says is "Ringtones website is currently
>>> down. Expected to be online again in Summer 2006. While you wait,
>>> check out some other free ringtone websites."
>>
>>
>> *gasp* Did I hear "ringtone"?! Are you by any chance one of the arseholes
>> that shower my blogs with hundreds of spam comments? I hate poker. I hate
>> ringtones. I even almost, just _almost_, hate pr0n.
>
> The latter is merely a glitch of manhood. :)
Oh, there's this other industry and niche that I totally forgot about. It
offers remedies to 'glitches of manhood'.
>>> Hardly inspires spiders to keep coming back, so if I were you I would
>>> add some content. Not only that, some of the sites linking to may
>>> remove their links as you have nothing to offer anyone. And if that
>>> happens, then you could go back to PR0
>>
>>
>> Whatever you do, keep it clean. And whatever it is that got you banned in
>> the first place, I imagine that you very much deserved it. Your niche is a
>> whorehouse that kills Web 2.0 (defined as "things that can be spammed").
>> Sorry to have been so direct and prejudiced...
>
> The fact that the whole niche is, doesn't make him a ... well you know.
> Now a days, even SEO is becomming a jucky word. And god knows what these
> these pimps are up to.
The same thing with the hacker-cracker crossover. I have come to the point of
being 'ashamed' of being in some hackers mailing lists. The word got
associated with troublemaking and wrongdoing; not justifiable so. Even some
spammers would say they do SEO, as means of embellishing their daytime job
description and make it sound like an occupation.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Disk quota exceeded; sig discontinued"
http://Schestowitz.com | Open Prospects ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
8:55pm up 39 days 2:28, 11 users, load average: 3.37, 3.41, 3.41
http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
|
|