On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:32:29 -0500, flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:26:43 -0500, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>
>> I don't see Roy as any kind of threat, other than the self-absorbed morals
>> don't apply to him variety.
>
>
> I did a little googling on Shysterwitch today and it's truly amazing how
> many pots he has his hands into.
Where do you get off calling him that, flatty? You consistently whine and
cry about Linux advocates behaviour, yet it's supposed to be fine for you
to twist people's names? Not in my book.
> I confess I really don't know what to make of it except that he is being
> paid somehow for all of this stuff because there is no way he could do
> doctorate studies and spam 500 different groups/blogs etc with his
> sewerage everyday without some kind of motive.
And what about you deluging this group with your crappy nymshifting and
lying, flatty? How'd you manage that day after day? And don't bother to
deny it.
Oh, and did you count all those groups/blogs he's supposedly posting to
all day? Did you check every one?
You're the one calling it spam. The rest of us aren't. Don't like it?
Killfile it. And stop whining. Try doing some advocacy for a change.
> The whole thing does not add up.
Sure it does - to nothing. You have no right whatever to control what Roy
does in the outside world, or when, or how, and no basis on which to
suggest he is doing anything wrong.
Personally, I don't believe *anyone* is paid to post to COLA, on either
side.
As for the opyright infringement - whatever the rights and wrongs of that,
it's between Roy and the creator of the material. No one else has any part
in it.
>
>
>>
>> Excuse me? What do I butch about not seeing?
>
> Butch?
> Let's leave Rex out of this one, ok?
Yes, lets. So stop dragging him in. Your continual slanders against him
are becoming deeply offensive.
--
Kier
|
|
