Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Latest Critical Patch Can Break Windows

begin  oe_protect.scr 
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> __/ [ William Poaster ] on Thursday 29 June 2006 10:45 \__
> 
>> This message was posted on Usenet, NOT JLAforums, & on  Thu, 29 Jun 2006
>> 09:03:50 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> 
>>> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Thursday 29 June 2006 08:28 \__
>>> 
>>>> begin  oe_protect.scr
>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>> Microsoft fixes Windows security patch
>>>>> 
>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>| However, the fix can interfere with certain dial-up networking
>>>>>| connections. Problems occur only with dial-up connections that use a
>>>>>| terminal window, or dial-up scripting, Microsoft said. This type of
>>>>>| connection may stop responding after the patch is applied, it added.
>>>>> `----
>>>>> 
>>>>>                 http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6089163.html
>>>> 
>>>> ah, so you secure your windows machine by preventing a network
>>>> connection.  I can see how that works.
>>> 
>>> It's like chopping off your whatsisname instead of using a condom.
>>> 
>>> Windows: when all all hope is lost, pull the wire out.
>> 
>> Maybe it's M$'s new anti-virus innovation! ;-)
> 
> I  have  seen people sob when their computer was forced  off
> the  network (socket disabled) due to viral issues. There is
> a  'grace' quota of two times, after which the person pays a
> fine of 35 quid _per disconnection_ (infection), for wasting
> staff's time and scanning ports on the network (slowing down
> or jeopardising others).
> 
> In  many  cases,  such  people come to the  point  of  being
> disconnected very many times (either you are always clean or
> you're  a total disaster). They never learned the lessson or
> manage  to protect Windows, even after a complete wipe, This
> proves  that,  much like Ballmer's 2-day  experience/ordeal,
> protecting  Windows  requires unnecessary  skills  (negation
> intended).
> 
> I was at least kind enough to offer a Ubuntu CD at the point
> of sobbing... *smile*
> 

Surely for most computer users, an Ubuntu CD and a USB key would be
enough for them?  Why bother with a built-in OS at all?

-- 
| Mark Kent   --   mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk  |
"Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!"
-- Monty Python and the Holy Grail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index