Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] A Comparison Between Windows XP and Ubuntu Linux

begin  oe_protect.scr 
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> Installing Ubuntu: A comparison of Ubuntu 6.06 and Windows XP
> 
> ,----[ Summary ]
>| Windows XP and Ubuntu 6.06 were both quick to install; each install was
>| complete in less than two hours. Windows took about twice as long as
>| Ubuntu to install, primarily because of the additional time required
>| to install (and update) non-OS software packages.
>| 
>| The largest potential problem with both operating system installations
>| is hardware recognition (as I encountered with Windows XP). Ubuntu's use
>| of a LiveCD is an advantage here, as it allows new users to test their
>| system before formatting their hard drive. However, more hardware
>| is generally supported in Windows than in Ubuntu, as many manufacturers
>| build Windows-specific drivers (but do not make Linux drivers).
>| 
>| Window's reliance on commercial software adds to the difficulty and
>| annoyance of its install. In Ubuntu, a lot of software is installed
>| by default, and additional packages can be searched for and installed
>| (for free) from an easy-to-use "add/remove programs" menu (note: the
>| primary exception to this are programs to play specific media formats,
>| some of which suffer from patent issues and thus can be more difficult
>| to obtain in Linux than in Windows, though EasyUbuntu and Ubuntu's help
>| pages deal with this). In Windows, many basic software packages (e.g.,
>| office suite, photo editing software, IM clients) are not installed by
>| default, and must be downloaded or purchased from a variety of websites
>| or companies. This commercial software also increases the chances of
>| ads appearing on the computer, as happened to me many times during
>| the Windows installation, but never in Ubuntu.
>| 
>| Linux is typically considered to be an extremely difficult operating
>| system to install. I believe Ubuntu challenges that perception.
> `----

It's interesting that now the Fud is quoted rather than the reality,
just like the bit above.  Linux is absolutely not a difficult OS to
install, the difference between linux and windows is that linux has
rarely been preinstalled.  Installation is easy when someone has done it
for you.

> 
> http://rhosgobel.blogspot.com/2006/06/installing-ubuntu-comparison-of-ubuntu.html

One wonders how long this can go on for before MS release some kind of
prettying-up patch for XP.  Sorry, I mean the next release of Windows...

-- 
| Mark Kent   --   mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk  |
Good day to avoid cops.  Crawl to work.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index