Roy Schestowitz wrote:
__/ [ [H]omer ] on Tuesday 20 June 2006 19:30 \__
Oh and PS: Emmy Huang, can you *try* to support 64 bit
architectures this time.
I have heard these rants before. *smile* One more deterrent for
64-bit O/Sen, which is the fault of a *binary*-form software
supplier... Windows is rarely an exception. 64-bit in XP and Vista
should be perceived as 'proof of concept' rather than something
practical. Drivers don't work, software is not supported, and I am
skeptic about performance gains as well.
I was offered a 64bit XP option for an extra £??? when I bought my
lappy, but declined, so I've never even seen it running. The 32bit XP
was wiped before I even got to read the EULA, along with Acer's
"recovery" partition, and everything else on the hard drive.
--
K.
http://slated.org - Slated, Rated & Blogged
Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5
14:40:32 up 3 days, 14:57, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.05, 0.01
|
|
