__/ [ Matt Probert ] on Sunday 12 March 2006 07:45 \__
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 04:40:27 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>__/ [ William Tasso ] on Saturday 11 March 2006 18:58 \__
>>
>>> <snip />
>>>> ...
>>>> Why not take the shorter route? There's a popular test that's even more
>>>> entertaining...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nerdtests.com/ft_nq.php?im
>>>>
>>>> I got an 89 when I took the test last year.
>>>
>>> "You must answer all of the questions to continue on."
>>>
>>> sorry - life is too short :)
>>
>>
>>Would you rather go through the 500-point Nerdity Test? See below.
>>
>>
>>__/ [ Matt Probert ] on Saturday 11 March 2006 19:23 \__
>>
>>> You just failed the nerd test. welcome to the real world of beer,
>>> wives, children, soccer, rugby, cricket, bawdy songs, and reminiscing
>>> when you see a young woman in a mini-skirt.....
>>
>>
>>Why does Nerdity have to conflict with those? These are not black shades
>>and white shades. Sex, sports and occupation with the computer are entirely
>>separate and independent dimensions.
>
> God give me strength!
>
> Roy, I think you have just earned an honours degree in being a nerd.
> Don't feel too bad, I don't think you are alone in the club. A large
> proportion of posters here are fellow members.
>
> Matt
I feel honoured to have been delivered the honour.
|
|
