On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:59:22 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ William Poaster ] on Wednesday 29 March 2006 13:52 \__
>
>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:32:24 +0100, Gordon wrote:
>>
>>> Security firms doing MS's job for them?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4856492.stm
>>
>>
>> Get this!
>>
>> "Microsoft said it could not endorse the patches or recommend that users
>> install them as they had not been through the software giant's testing
>> and evaluation program."
>>
>> Sour grapes, or what.
>
> Maybe they could pay off the third-party or acquire it.
"Acquire" it, eh? As M$ are bullies, does this entail "sending some of the
boys round"....<grin>
>The changed to the list will remain minute:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_Microsoft_Corporation
--
SuSE 10.1 OSS Beta8 (Agama Lizard)
All posts from googlegroups.com are killfiled.
"Internet Explorer; a collection of security holes
held together by browser code”- Novell.
|
|
