Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Security Goes in Favour of Linux

  • Subject: Re: [News] Security Goes in Favour of Linux
  • From: see.sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 15:27:29 +0800
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
  • References: <7380594.6EGgQmbGM0@schestowitz.com> <7DSdg.153$xO5.61@trnddc03>
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1113115
Mathew P. wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 2006-05-25, Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>> Small Security Risk Still Big Selling Point for Linux
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>| Even companies hawking Linux antivirus products acknowledge that
>>| the operating system doesn't suffer from many security woes at this
>>| point. "Our product is more used to filtering Windows viruses than
>>| actual Linux viruses," said Ron O'Brien, an analyst at Sophos, a
>>| security firm in Abingdon, England.
>> `----
>>
>>                 http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/50724.html
> 
> Just wondering; are there any Linux viruses out there? Can anyone
> give me an example and info? And if so, have any of them ever been
> consistently successful given the assumption of proper user habits?
> 
> I know that there have been limited exploits in particular daemons
> and servers that have been discovered and fixed fairly quickly, and
> of course the infamous root kit, but I refer here to actual attacks
> by malware; viruses, trojans, etc.
> 

Oh, you'll need to ask our resident expert on that. Erik will tell you all
about the many, many viruses existent.

;-) ;-) :-)

Cheers,
WS

-- 
change to leews to mail


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index