Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> I joined the SuSE camp around the time (or immediately
> after) Novell took over. I knew nothing else, but at the
> time it was still called SuSE (neither SUSE, nor OpenSUSE,
> nor Opensuse). It was KDE-based, vibrant, and reliable
> (10.0 wasn't a big hit). I still use SuSE 8.1 most of the
> time. Rock-solid and probably more pleasing than 9.3, which
> I have at home...
SuSE 6.4 was also solid. It ran very smoothly on an AMD K6-2,
450 MHz. I preferred the way they did YaST back then instead of
now in 10.1. It seemed a lot more straight forward and easier
to use.
--
HPT
|
|