Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
> wjbell wrote:
>
>> Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
>>> wjbell wrote:
>>>
>>>> Roy Culley wrote:
>>>>> Since your gambling return you haven't continued your inane
>>>>> followups to Roy S' posts. Has your master plan backfired. Is
>>>>> their something cunning in your not making these inane followups
>>>>> anymore?
>>>>>
>>>>> Come on Erik, you said there was a plan. What was it? Or were you
>>>>> just being a plonker as usual?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you always run away Erik? You have stopped spamming Roy's
>>>>> [News] post so what was the plan Erik? I can only conclude that
>>>>> you are pathetic twat. Prove me wrong Erik.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've got a question: Do you have a life other than cola? Just curious.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've got a question: Do you have a life other than trolling cola?
>>> Apart from plagiarizing firewall scripts, naturally. Just curious.
>>
>> Come out of our cave, have we?
>>
>> FYI: You flubbed the firewall argument long ago. You've shown that you
>> made the whole thing up by refusing to answer my questions in the thread
>> linked in my sig. Your actions spoke volumes.
>>
>
> Poor wjbell.
Don't feel sorry for me. I have a very full life. You're the one with
the negative attitude and always crying. I'm sorry to hear your life
sucks, Peter.
> Your only escape in that thread was to claim that someone "forged" your
> posts. All of them in the thread I provided URLs for
>
> How much dumber can you get than that, software thief wjbell?
And your only proof was... that's right, none at all.
--
wjbell
Peter K abandon his firewall lie:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e6eaf7e09552e5e2?hl=en
Jim R failing to address the issue after being asked:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ad37ca14a2d7224?hl=en
|
|
