"cc" <scatnubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> cc <scatnubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
>>
>> > spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >> And here again, we see the exceedingly common wintoll tactic of attempted
>> >> character assassination because they know most of the things rex says in
>> >> this newsgroup make them look like total fools...
>> >>
>> >> Attack and discredit the person. It's far simpler than arguing against the
>> >> message in a civilised manner.
>> >>
>> >> Slime has more dignity.
>>
>> > While they do character assassination(see flatfish on Roy deserving to
>> > have his luggage lost), pointing out a lie is not character
>> > assassination. Rex posts some far out shit sometimes, with no
>> > references, and in this case someone called him out on it.
>>
>> He posted that?
>> Here?
>> Really?
>
> Yes. And you're right, people did (and do) question his claims
> originally. But it's hard to prove that something *didn't* happen,
> especially for some of Rex's claims. He won't put up evidence or
> references when questioned on his bs, but you're right, that doesn't
> necessarily mean he is or isn't lying. This time someone just happened
> to get some facts. There's no need to get all upset about it. Flatfish,
> DFS, and others have also ignored their own hypocrisy and incorrect
> facts, even when the proof is put in front of their faces. You can't do
> anything but call it out when you see it.
>
I think he was referring to Roy's luggage. Not Rex's bullshit.
But since Roy has repeatedly wished castration , mutilation and death
on posters here, its hardly shocking retaliation.
|
|
