Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Just as I had thought - Novell is the bomb planter

  • Subject: Re: Just as I had thought - Novell is the bomb planter
  • From: B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:55:57 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <54KdndOdN48S5cLYnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@comcast.com> <20061118213456.05646ed7@ed-desktop> <2539964.vt3aJssZS5@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: KNode/0.9.0
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1183996
On Saturday 18 November 2006 23:26 Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> __/ [ ed ] on Saturday 18 November 2006 21:32 \__
> 
>> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:18:19 -0500
>> Geico Caveman <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/11/18/1838229.shtml
>>> 
>>> Time to reject any patches or code coming from Novell or its employees
>>> ?
>>> 
>>> This deal sounds more and more like SCO with improvements. SCO failed
>>> because they could never point to a piece of code and prove it was
>>> stolen.
>>> 
>>> I think that Microsoft is making up for that mistake by using their
>>> new great friends at Novell to do the planting for them. Months later,
>>> when the offending code has made its way into most distros, Microsoft
>>> will swing in with the just cause.
>>> 
>>> I said precisely this a few days ago in my response to John "Novell
>>> uber alles" Bailo.
>>> 
>>> Its time to cut Novell off before they succeed in planting any bombs
>>> in Linux kernel / app code.
>> 
>> but as i think roy said recently, the moment they do that it's SCO stage
>> 1, prove that there is stolen code. how can they do this? and if they
>> saiy "Noel Power" submitted code, then it's svn rollback time and remove
>> that diff, svn export and repackage (after a clean build of course).
>> 
>> if they cannot suggest what code is stolen then there is no case.
>> 
>> and besides all this. people are going to move away from novel's linux
>> in droves, hopefully to something better like debian. where politics is
>> more important, the chances of this stuff going unnoticed is less likely
>> to make it into the stable branch.
>> 
>> besides all that, i prefer the OO.org macro language.
>  
> Having just read a certain article, I think I now see where it all
> began...
> 
> http://applications.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/11/08/1726205&from=rss
> 
> See the comments. Someone must have read it and sent it to Slashdot, but I
> haven't checked this carefully. Like you say, people will be going in
> droves where 'politics' comes before money (if money is involved at all).
> I really hope that a fork which is backed by many active developers comes
> out of SUSE soon. I want to stay with SUSE but say goodbye to Novell. I
> feel bad for SUSE developers whom I know... they did nothing wrong, but
> that management is completely out of touch.

This is a "me too" post:-)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index