On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:02:50 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ Doug Mentohl ] on Wednesday 15 November 2006 18:46 \__
>
>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:39:18 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> By the way, the Chinese, German and French government can confirm that
>>> there are deliberate back doors (with undocumented protocols for access,
>>> surely).
>>
>> Do you have any links ..
>
>
> http://www.heise.de/ct/english/98/08/042/
>
> http://digg.com/linux_unix/Windows_Might_Become_a_US_Government_Thingy#c2683628
>
> http://www.geocities.com/~budallen/backdoor.html
>
> http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/uk-wants-backdoor-in-next-version-of-microsoft-windows/
None of these things support your bald faced statement that "the Chinese,
German and French governments can confirm that there are deliberate back
doors" in Vista.
Don't wave your hands around. Provide links that the Chinese, German, and
French governments confirm this.
The first link is talking about standard remote access services, services
that exist in Linux as well.
The second link talks about DHS encouraging people to apply a critical
patch.
The third link talks about the, by now, multiply debunked *THOERY* of an
NSA backdoor. This was debunked by the likes of Bruce Schnier.
The fourth link is about something a government wants, not what is.
Come on, Roy. Step up to the plate. Provide your evidence.
|
|
