yttrx wrote:
> Andrea <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> Red Hat Doesn't Want Mono
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | There are a lot of great new programs and innovations expected
>>> | in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. The Novell-led Mono project isn't
>>> | one of them.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3644981
>>>
>>> I hope that Ubuntu (Canonical) follows suit. Some say that Mono, if not
>>> OpenOffice as well, is a/the legal landmine.
>> Seems like a paranoia.
>>
>
> Yeah?
>
> Microsoft: "if you use our stuff without paying a licensing fee, we'll
> sue you"
>
> Redhat: "so wait, mono is yours and has a licensing fee?"
>
> Microsoft: "Yup"
>
> Redhat: "see ya"
>
> Whats hard to understand?
>
I may claim that moon is made from swiss cheesee - which does not
necessary involve that it is... so, Microsoft must prove, that using
mono (which is NOT .Net, although is compatible with it) requires paying
a fee. As for this moment, there is no proof.
--
Andrea |ASRock K7Upgrade-880, AMD Sempron 2800+, Pentagram QC-80Cu
1024MB DDR-400, Sapphire Radeon 9600 128MB, Samsung SyncMaster 960BF
Seagate 380021A 80GB, WDC 2000JS 200GB, Sony DW-Q28A, ModeCom 350GTF
|
|
