begin oe_protect.scr
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Sunday 08 October 2006 18:10 \__
>
>> begin oe_protect.scr
>> Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> flatfish+++ wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 06:42:13 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In today's digest, we have:
>>>>
>>>> SPAM.
>>>> This was already posted.
>>>> Why do we need to see it a second time?
>
>
> You'll eat your peas and you'll enjoy them, too. *smile*
>
>
>>> Because we like to?
>>>
>>> Feel free to use your awesome killfile capabilities
>
>
> Killfile? That's jargon a troll would not understand.
>
Odd, isn't it? Perhaps they need a newsreader upgrade?
>
>> Spam has a rather different definition, I think. This is clearly
>> labelled, is not selling anything, is absolutely on-topic, and, in fact,
>> is what says on the tin, a digest.
>
>
> The shills realise it achieves wider exposure through keyword stuffing. Their
> exployers does not like that.
>
Good point. Maybe I'll try a couple of searches on google groups and
see what comes up. Hadn't really considered that.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
I'm not proud.
|
|
