__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Sunday 08 October 2006 18:10 \__
> begin oe_protect.scr
> Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> flatfish+++ wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 06:42:13 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>>>
>>>> In today's digest, we have:
>>>
>>> SPAM.
>>> This was already posted.
>>> Why do we need to see it a second time?
You'll eat your peas and you'll enjoy them, too. *smile*
>> Because we like to?
>>
>> Feel free to use your awesome killfile capabilities
Killfile? That's jargon a troll would not understand.
> Spam has a rather different definition, I think. This is clearly
> labelled, is not selling anything, is absolutely on-topic, and, in fact,
> is what says on the tin, a digest.
The shills realise it achieves wider exposure through keyword stuffing. Their
exployers does not like that.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | United States: #1 in spam export
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 25.3% user, 3.2% system, 1.1% nice, 70.4% idle
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|
