Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Vista Could be Further Delayed, MS Could Blame Europe as an Excuse?

  • Subject: Re: Vista Could be Further Delayed, MS Could Blame Europe as an Excuse?
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:00:56 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / ISBE, Manchester University / ITS / Netscape / MCC
  • References: <1160337877.522232.265570@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1160377253.164716.130420@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <17882871.6mHCWXNxVa@schestowitz.com> <20061009111249625+0100@news.individual.net>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Peter Hayes ] on Monday 09 October 2006 11:12 \__

> In <17882871.6mHCWXNxVa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Roy Schestowitz  wrote:
>> __/ [ nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] on Monday 09 October 2006 08:00 \__
>> 
>>> newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> Analysts split over Vista launch date
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>> | A delay for Vista now would be convenient for Microsoft, Gartner
>>>> | analyst David Mitchell-Smith argued, because "when people start
>>>> | complaining about the delay, Microsoft can reasonably say 'don't
>>>> | blame us' and point the finger at the EC."
>>>> `----
>>> 
>>> Some small credit for the delay goes to the Firefox team, that forced
>>> Microsoft to move developers away from Vista to work on IE.
>>> Something they surely wouldn't have done otherwise.  (In case anybody
>>> thinks that monopolies are good for the consumer.)
>> 
>> I once read about XBox developers who were being team-swapped to
>> assist Vista (possibly the same with Microsoft's 'Photoshop killer',
>> IIRC). There are managers involved in those switches as well (some
>> swapped, some just left). Do you have something to support this
>> assessment that the IE team (that which was (re-)assembled after 5
>> years of ignoring Web woes) squeezed talent and expertise out of
>> Windows? If so, this may explain the "development crash" of Vista, as
>> Ballmer recently referred to it.
> 
> Surely switching staff around like that isn't very efficient. They won't
> be up to speed on their new project, or is the code so compartmentalised
> that they can work on one snippet without understanding the context?

But wait... it has only gotten worse.

Microsoft Internal Transfers Just Got a Whole Lot Easier

,----[ Quote ]
| It also addresses concerns people have noted here about getting permission
| to interview and suffering demoralizing lock-in when their manager deigns
| them too essential to leave (at least the VP now has to step up and go
| on record for the lock-in - may they feel the cool breeze of future
| accountability on the back of their neck with every consideration).
`----

http://minimsft.blogspot.com/2006/10/microsoft-internal-transfers-just-got.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index