Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> __/ [ Sinister Midget ] on Wednesday 04 October 2006 10:21 \__
>
>> On 2006-10-03, B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>>
>>> I wonder what would happen if the E.U. were to say, "We've had enough.
>>> You can sell Vista here, but before you sell even a single copy, you show
>>> us
>>> that it complies". I reckon the boot would be on the other foot, and we'd
>>> see how amazingly quickly MS can do these things.....
>>
>> I think what we'd see, against all odds, is an already shoddy product
>> made worse. Or another 2 year delay in releasing it throughout the
>> world, and _then_ a product worse than the current alphas people are
>> trying.
>
> The product will not be stable (not even with long delays) unless it's
> returned for the coders to call off the feature freeze and begin that
> muchly-needed re-write of 60% of the code. You can employ 1,000 builders to
> patch a 100-year-old building, but that will never make the building as
> stable as a new one. Demolishment is pending. Anything else is a route to
> disaster.
And yet all the reviews of the latest build disagree with you.
Hmm : who to believe?
--
KDE == (see GayDE) Kool Desktop Environment - Make X Window look like winbloze...
What a fucking great idea! The developers of this have a mental sickness,
please avoid this product -> see GNOME.
-- Jakes on #Debian
|
|