[H]omer wrote:
> Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
>> Hadron Quark wrote:
>>
>>> Why not put the link next to the titles?!?!?!?
>>>
>>> e.g
>>>
>>> "this article is about" : http;/link
>>>
>>> jesus.
>>>
>>> You could also strip all the "Roy" rubbish from the bits further down -
>>> its is totally redundant and takes up a huge % of the digest post. Since
>>> the idea is to post the LINKS and not to massage Roy's ego, we really
>>> dont need his misquotes included with the links. People that want to see
>>> Roy's misquotes can see the original posts - but of course most people
>>> have them filtered.
>>>
>>> As it is you are wasting bandwidth unnecessarily and a potential service
>>> is becoming bogged down in reposted garbage and politics.
>>>
>>> Surely a little readability and presentation isn't beyond you?
>>>
>>
>> This is just great.
>> Complaining about "wasted bandwidth" by a wintroll quoting the
>> entire "reason" of his idiotic complaint
>>
>> < snip digest >
>
> I knew it was a mistake for Mark to pander to the WinTrolls whims;
No, it was not.
We are hearing those shrill shrieks from flatfish, Erik F or Hadron Quark
because they got exactly what they were asking for
> all
> they give him for his efforts is criticism. I don't know why he bothers.
>
Well, "hearing" (reading) their shrill drivel is certainly worth some
effort.
They don't notice that they appear to be exactly what they are: Rather
stupid trolls, but with an agenda
--
Windows isn't unstable. It's spontaneous.
|
|
