Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Proof Why Closed Source Ophttp://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/post?hl=en&inreplyto=0d22257571bf2536&reply_to=group&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fcomp.os.linux.advocacy%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Ff5b279553da7de6c%2F81046adadb16ffbc%3Fhl%3Den%26erating Systems are Failing
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | In the end, my recommendation remains that closed source OS' will
> | eventually falter. Perhaps not in light of Linux or anything else, but
> | it will happen. And maybe not even to the open source development world
> | as we know it today. But mark your calendars folks, this is the year
> | when Microsoft is about to be schooled and schooled hard about the
> | golden rule of sales - the customer is always right. Vista will make
> | moderate sales I'm sure, but because of the closed source nature of
> | Vista, we will see attacks on this version of Windows unlike anything
> | the world has ever seen. You just wait and see. Things are about to
> | get very ugly, and I can hardly wait...
That's funny. I read the article and I didn't see anything that even
remotely approaches the definition of "PROOF" as I understand the term.
Quite honestly, I've seen better "proof" that Elvis is still alive and
living in seclusion.