begin oe_protect.scr
Sinister Midget <phydeaux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> On 2006-10-15, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:14:51 +0200, Roy Culley wrote:
>>
>>> Toplist of Posters
>>>
>>> Pos Poster Msgs Bytes Quoted
>>> 1. Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 392 509029 22%
>>> 2. Hadron Quark - IMBECILE 232 294931 68%
>>> 3. flatfish - TROLL / THIEF / LIAR / RACIST 191 221061 74%
>>> 4. Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxx> 143 115930 62%
>>> 5. Ewik 'the Weasel' Funkenbusch [4] 118 174861 74%
>>> 6. DooFuS - LIAR / WINTROLL / RACIST 82 59135 51%
>>> 7. Rick <none@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 81 88138 80%
>>> 8. Peter Köhlmann <Peter.Koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> 80 96281 70%
>>> 9. JEDIDIAH <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 74 126139 69%
>>> 10. Oliver Wong - MS Apologist 69 136646 43%
>>> 11. Tim 'Funkenbusch Wannabee' Smith 66 57458 32%
>>> 12. The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 54 127541 54%
>>
>> Gee.. 8 of the top 12 are Windows advocates. Yes, Roy is doing a lot to
>> reduce the clutter in this newsgroup isn't he? In fact, he's encouraging
>> more.
>
> I agree.
>
> The problem is that one person can't be expected to do it alone. So I
> vote all advocates try to step up to the plate. If the rest of us can
> manage 3 posts per day, the Windummies won't be able to get a word in
> edgewise.
>
> Well, except for the Ewikisms that have been following Roy everywhere.
Erik's clearly got some game going here - he even states that he's a
"Windows Advocate", even though he knows this is a linux group - this is
almost beyond belief. I have no idea why /anyone/ bothers to give Erik
the time of day. As he's now taken to stalking Roy S, perhaps some of
the on-topic posters will consider the cold-shoulder for Erik?
We should not be encouraging off-topic/spammers like Erik, Hadron,
Flatty, and so on.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
Of course you can't flap your arms and fly to the moon. After a while you'd
run out of air to push against.
|
|
