begin risky.vbs
<255gvk25newv$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:18:47 GMT, Sinister Midget wrote:
>
>> So, he's wrong for quoting what someone else stated? Apparently
>> they're quoting others, too. The people /they/ quoted have updated
>> their story:
>
> Yes, he's wrong.
>
>> IOW it's Roy's fault (your contention) that he quoted someone who
>> quoted someone who quoted it wrong.
>
> Yes. It's his fault. A) because he did not check the facts. If
> you're going to be a "journalist" you can't just blindly republish
> everything and then claim "it's not my fault", especially when you
> don't even have permission to republish in the first place.
Where has Roy S ever stated he's a journalist? He posts links with
snippets of the content. He does sometimes provides a subject which
may be misleading but compared to the lies and FUD you have posted to
COLA for so many years it is insignificant.
--
Security is one of those funny things. You can talk about being "more"
secure, but there's no such thing. A vulnerability is a vulnerability, and
even one makes you just as insecure as anyone else. Security is a binary
condition, either you are or you aren't. - Funkenbusch 1 Oct 2006
|
|
