On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:59:17 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Microsoft puts the post-Vista wheels in motion
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| Windows Vista is not fully baked, but that doesn't mean senior management
>| isn't already thinking about "Vista+1" as they like to call the next
>| Windows client release...
> `----
>
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=45
>
> This name may be an implication that Vista is not satisfactory [1], as judged
> by Microsoft's own eyes. What surprises me is that they still neglect
> Singularity and ignore the need to rewrite [2,3]. Below are some very
> relevant (and recent) articles
You really have no clue what you're talking about, Roy.
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| The overall quality of this $399 Windows Vista Ultimate edition
>| isn't deserving of final-release-candidate status, says CNET's Robert
>| Vamosi. Expect to see at least one more interim build or perhaps even
>| another release candidate soon.
> `----
>
> http://news.com.com/1606-2_3-6124945.html?part=rss&tag=6124945&subj=news
>
> [2]
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| "Up to 60% of the code in the new consumer version of Microsoft new Vista
>| operating system is set to be rewritten as the Company 'scrambles' to fix
>| internal problems a Microsoft insider has confirmed to SHN... Microsoft has
>| also admitted that it has major problems in it's Windows division and has
>| has immediately initiated a total restructure of the division..."
> `----
>
> http://www.smarthouse.com.au/Computing/Platforms?Article=/Computing/Platforms/R7G5G6U4
>
> [3] In Depth: The Next Windows After Vista Will Demand Radical Rethinking
> From Microsoft
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| Microsoft is at a crossroads, and the operating system that follows
>| Vista will likely mark a serious break from the past. That is, if
>| Microsoft can figure out how to do things differently.
> `----
>
> http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=192501131&cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All
Amazing!
|
|
