Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Vista Cannot Be Run Virtualised...

In <fLLXg.919$wf1.573@xxxxxxxxxxxx> flatfish+++  wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:04:47 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> 
>> ...Unless you pay a lot of money.
>> 
>> Microsoft Vista licence restrictions hit hardware hard 
>> 
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | While the expensive versions of Vista, Vista Ultimate and Vista 
>> | Business, can be installed within a Virtual Machine environment, 
>> | Vole forbids you from doing so with the cheaper Vista Home Basic 
>> | and Vista Home Premium.
>> `----
>> 
>> http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=35057
>> 
>> Another way of punishing/suppressing users of VMWare, Xen, Parallels, 
>> Boot Camp...  meanwhile, on the dual-boot front:  Vista scoots to new 
>> boot, but it's still kinda rooted  ,----[ Quote ]
>> | While Microsoft would like the world to believe that anyone running 
>> | Windows  has no need of any other operating system, that attitude 
>> | doesn't cut much  mustard with many of its users.
>> `----
>> 
>> http://www.apcstart.com/site/akidman/2006/09/1656/vista-scoots-to-new-
>> boot-but-its-still-kinda-rooted  So, essentially, Microsoft now owns 
>> your hardware and controls the way it is being used. Not to mention 
>> DRM for your data, WGA, and TC...
> 
> 
> Another pro linux post

It certainly is. Every extra impediment Microsoft adds to their EULAs 
only pushes legitimate users towards Linux or the Mac.

-- 

Peter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index