Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Roy Schestowitz: "This is a Linux newsgroup."

  • Subject: Re: Roy Schestowitz: "This is a Linux newsgroup."
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:14:11 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / ISBE, Manchester University / ITS / Netscape / MCC
  • References: <K_OWg.41158$tT6.11306@bignews7.bellsouth.net> <452bbf84$0$556$b45e6eb0@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu> <1160500100.018045.32970@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <ubnni29n0cbthphbi44bfj0u3mctb7tnrl@4ax.com> <1160503434.154619.175960@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <7hqpi25033ljmvo799ehavmf3e0iah7gba@4ax.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ chrisv ] on Wednesday 11 October 2006 14:05 \__

> Larry Qualig checked my message-ID, then wrote:
> 
>>chrisv wrote:
>>> Larry Qualig checked our message ID's, then wrote:
>>> >
>>> >What????  You don't see the obvious connection between Bill Gates
>>> >salary and Linux? The connection between where Steve Ballmer goes on
>>> >vacation and Linux? The connection between the brand of car Gates
>>> >drives and Linux? The connection between Nasdaq trading volume for MSFT
>>> >and Linux?
>>>
>>> Idiot.
>>
>>I see that you're unable to present a coherent argument so you once
>>again resort to name-calling much like a small child would.
> 
> Well, your net-kopping gets a bit tiresome as well, Larry.
> 
>>> There is certainly a "connection" between the M$ operating
>>> systems and Linux.
>>
>>So?????  Did I ever say there wasn't a connection between MS's
>>operating systems and Linux. (Try reading for a change before you open
>>your pie-hole.)
> 
> You kind of implied that the news articles did not deal with M$
> operating systems and software, Larry, when many do.
> 
>>Hint: What I said is that there is no connection between where Ballmer
>>goes on vacation and Linux. There is no connection between the brand of
>>car Gates has and Linux.
> 
> Did Roy post news articles that talked of those issues?  If so, I did
> not see them.  If not, what the hell are you talking about?
> 
>>With "advocates" like you supporting Linux there's little danger of it
>>ever becoming a desktop OS for the masses.
> 
> I'd sure like to see you build a logical case for that claim, Larry.

Ballmer? Vacation? Larry must be delusional. Gary Steward would gladly borrow
some pills.

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      | "This sig seemed like a good idea at the time..."
http://Schestowitz.com  |     GNU/Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap:  1036184k total,   537356k used,   498828k free,    42004k cached
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index