Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> begin oe_protect.scr
> Roy Culley <rgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> begin risky.vbs
>> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:27:42 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> Message-ID: <1937913.ddvL4nukvb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Message-ID: <1161007359.722111.47330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Now you're reposting all your messages through Google?
>> Look Erik, Roy explained he was having trouble with his newsfeed
>> and hence some messages might appear twice. Your obsession with
>> Roy's [News] posts is utterly childish and simply making you look a
>> fool. For goodness sake grow up.
> I think you expect from Erik more than he's able to deliver.
> Clearly, he's been tasked with undermining Roy's on-topic news
> posts, so he's trying everthing he can to do that.
Erik has been nothing but a pathetic MS troll for a long time. He's
been a proven liar for many years. Why anyone who regularly reads COLA
gives any regard to him amazes me.
> I'm glad I'm not owned.
Me too. I'm still awaiting Erik's master plan for spamming Roy S'
posts. Clearly it is really cunning as it has me completely baffled.
Security is one of those funny things. You can talk about being "more"
secure, but there's no such thing. A vulnerability is a vulnerability, and
even one makes you just as insecure as anyone else. Security is a binary
condition, either you are or you aren't. - Funkenbusch 1 Oct 2006