begin risky.vbs
<vtkh04-o5b.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> begin oe_protect.scr
> Roy Culley <rgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> begin risky.vbs
>> <14w5zbhjtqses.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:27:42 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <1937913.ddvL4nukvb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <1161007359.722111.47330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Now you're reposting all your messages through Google?
>>
>> Look Erik, Roy explained he was having trouble with his newsfeed
>> and hence some messages might appear twice. Your obsession with
>> Roy's [News] posts is utterly childish and simply making you look a
>> fool. For goodness sake grow up.
>
> I think you expect from Erik more than he's able to deliver.
> Clearly, he's been tasked with undermining Roy's on-topic news
> posts, so he's trying everthing he can to do that.
Erik has been nothing but a pathetic MS troll for a long time. He's
been a proven liar for many years. Why anyone who regularly reads COLA
gives any regard to him amazes me.
> I'm glad I'm not owned.
Me too. I'm still awaiting Erik's master plan for spamming Roy S'
posts. Clearly it is really cunning as it has me completely baffled.
--
Security is one of those funny things. You can talk about being "more"
secure, but there's no such thing. A vulnerability is a vulnerability, and
even one makes you just as insecure as anyone else. Security is a binary
condition, either you are or you aren't. - Funkenbusch 1 Oct 2006
|
|
