flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:46:57 +0000, Oliver Wong wrote:
>
> > "flatfish+++" <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:io7_g.35$vG3.14@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:28:43 +0000, Oliver Wong wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Assuming it's wrong, was Roys claim malicious FUD, or an honest
> >>> mistake?
> >>
> >> A person who uses copyrighted graphics without the authors permission and
> >> continues to do so even after being notified is not honest.
> >
> > In the above sentence, "honest" modifies "mistake", not "Roy".
>
> Who cares.
>
> Roy is dishonest.
>
> It's already been proved.
>
>
> >> Sounds like you are trying to get back in his good graces.
> >> Your mouth overfloweth with honey.
> >
> > The problem with being neutral is both sides think you prefer the other
> > side. =P FWIW, I'm not particularly concerned with what you think of me.
> >
> > - Oliver
>
>
> There is no such thing as being neutral with Linux zealots.
> From their perspective either you are with them or against them.
>
> Look at the lambasting kier took a couple of weeks ago when he had the
> audacity to disagree with the them...
Come down off your high horse and tell us again how the government is
reading your mind. You're legally(maybe illegally too) insane and you
need help.
|
|
