Hadron Quark wrote:
> "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
>>> Hadron Quark wrote:
>>
>>>> Much better. Any idea what I might be missing?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The correct fonts
>>
>> And common sense.
>
> Fucking typical. I ask a proper question with no malice and I get the
> "you're a retard" response.
>
Well, you are
If you don't want to be treated as one, don't act like one
> I read BBC every day, CNN every day, multiple web pages every day and
> the only one that looks shit is the new self appointed "linux standard"
> page.
>
Too bad for you. You are the proverbial exception then
> As per usual, I expected nothing of help to come from this NG.
>
What do you expect? Helping a retard like you?
> Its almost embarassing how stupid you make yourselves look.
>
Well, even if that were true, it is still way better than being a lying
retard like you
> So, what font am I missing? Without me taking a degree in how to be an
> HTML dweeb that is : because, frankly, they are 2 a penny.
>
Find it out for yourself. After all, you claim to be a linux user. Since the
linux users here don't seem to have a problem, it has to be your setup
which you yourself botched.
In reality, you just use a liveCD (like DFS) with limited fonts and limited
applications. And then tell us that you are such a good linux user.
>> --
>> K.
>> http://slated.org - Slated, Rated & Blogged
>> This message has not been photoshopped in any way.
>>
>> Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5
>> 18:49:09 up 79 days, 19:05, 3 users, load average: 1.60, 1.03, 0.68
>
You are also one in need of a little sister to configure your newsreader
correctly. How do you think you would be able to configure /anything/ if
you are unable to get even such simple, small things right?
--
If you had any brains, you'd be dangerous.
|
|