On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:53:04 -0500, flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:32:56 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
>
>> "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>> GNOME 2.16 Release Notes
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>> | GNOME 2.16 is the latest version of the GNOME Desktop; a popular,
>>>> | multi-platform desktop environment for Linux?, UNIX? and other
>>>> | platforms. Based on Free and Open Source Software, GNOME provides all
>>>> | of the common tools computer users have come to expect of a modern
>>>> | computing environment, as well as a flexible and powerful platform
>>>> | for software developers.
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> http://www.gnome.org/start/2.16/notes/C/
>>>>
>>>> Better than a release once in 5 years.
>>>
>>> Little dig (Digg) there Roy ;Â
>>>
>>> I like the "eye candy" section, and this:
>>>
>>> http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Desktop_Project
>>>
>>> Looks good ...
>>
>> It cracks me up that a web page devoted to "looking good" uses non
>> standard fonts for its cover page and looks far from good. I have
>> extolled the virtues of Ubuntu & FF here lots of times : it looks much
>> better than XP. But really, check this out:
>>
>> http://img3.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/0221b44fcb.png
>
>
> That looks horrid under firefox and PCLinuxOS.
>
> Of course, the "works fine for me" gang is mobilizing at this very moment.
So, if it looks fine on someone else's machine, they're
automatically supposed to be lying? Jesus you are a real scummy piece of
work, flatfish. Get your head of of Quark's arse before you swallow too
much shit and suffocate.
It doesn't look anything like that on my PC.
--
Kier
|
|
