flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:53:52 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
>
>> flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> What's the matter Linux loonies?
>>> Is your retention level so poor that you have to read Roy Shysterwitch's
>>> articles twice?
>>>
>>> And Mark Kent?
>>>
>>> We know he is not the sharpest knife in the box but exactly what purpose
>>> does re-posting all the same articles in one post serve?
>>
>> No : fairs fair - I have all Roy's initial boring spam posts filtered. I
>> would like the digest to browse through at my leisure. Credit where
>> credit is due. Although, of course, its easy for Mark to do it because
>> he's so far up Roy's backside that he cant but help recycle his shit.
>
>
> Yea, the digest idea is a good one but:::::
>
> I thought the idea was to post a digest INSTEAD of both Roy's articles AND
> Mark's digest?
Yes. Common sense would suggest that. But Roytoy has decided that he
wont do it because then he wouldnt see his name is lights so
frequently. And Mark's digest thing is probably autobuilt from Roytoy's
original repostings of links stolen from the major Linux sites who went
to effort & cost to report initially : thus depriving them of their
possible advertising royalties and so further hurting the entire OSS
community. And yet the gang cant see that. Roy is doing so much to hurt
the OSS community it scares me.
>
> Seems like the COLA gang is incapable of following logic and reasoning.
>
> It is quite funny to watch them trip over their own feet though.
--
El triste fin de un bacÃn.
|
|
