Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> __/ [ Andrea ] on Wednesday 20 September 2006 11:56 \__
>
>> On 2006-09-20 12:35, * cc wrote:
>>> Dear Scoot "Fecalphiliac" Nudds,
>>>
>>> Could you take your advocacy of the green apple nasties to a more
>>> appropriate newsgroup please? Maybe alt.advocacy.poop? Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Marvin Haglar
>>>
>>
>> What about posting directly to /dev/null ?
>
> With BCC to his employer, of course. How else would that monthly paycheck be
> justified?
Does Roy's self righteousness know no bounds? One minute he's stealing
copyright material, next he's threatening to give people black eyes and
castrate them and now he's threatening people with reporting them to
their employers!!!! ROTFL. Sickening. Get a life.
How's the "free" search engine going Roy? Got past the prototype html
input field yet? How are the hordes of OSS programmers getting on? Its
not too far fetched to think that it'll be a success after all.
http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative
>From the Wiki "About IURON" page:
,----
| "See documents in the front page. Nothing particularly interesting in
| this page, yet."
`----
And aint that the truth. And so reusable. But that should all change :
,----
| Willingness of users to lend bandwidth is a key issue. Yet another issue
| is willingness of Webmasters to serve requests for pages. These are key
| issues that I have just been reminded of by somebody.
`----
So lets get this straight : you had to be *reminded* that? And you are
designing a "free" search engine (I never paid for using one in my
life)? LOL. All big ideas and half assed delivery.
But then most of your musings include "Hmm, that reminds me" .. its
called pretentious posturing while you frantically use Google (who you
aim to usurp) to get some backing material for your mindless rants.
Oh Sorry. You copied the idea? Nothing new there then:
,----
| The idea of a distributed search engine was recently conceived and also
| inspired by Majestic12.
`----
But lets waffle on some more and add some meaningless hot air:
,----
| The intention is to possibly use clients' computer idle time in order to
| keep this a self-maintaining and Open Source project. This should not be
| a commercial project with profits in mind. It aims to provide a service
| that puts an end to biased services with advertisements and
| sponsorships.
`----
Do you ever read what you write?
How the fuck do you equate using clients computer idle time to "self
maintaining Open Source"????
my favourite is this little bit of gobbledygook:
,----
| To me, it sure sounds like Google have thought about machine learning
| that feeds on peer-reviewed literature already. Then again, I might be
| over-presumptuous and mistaken altogether.
`----
Hmm. Might you? That would be a shock to your regular readers.
Keep it up Roy : you sound more ridiculous the deeper into this
syndrome you recede.
|
|
