Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> __/ [ yttrx ] on Sunday 17 September 2006 15:03 \__
>
>> [H]omer <spam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>> __/ [ Gubo Dangle ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 20:57 \__
>>>>> It happens that Roy Schestowitz formulated :
>>>
>>>>>> Xgl / Compiz Motion Blur
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>> | Demo of motion blur on a bleeding edge build, completely
>>>>>> | unedited.
>>>>>> `----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-Ln4xQhILs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And that's a _low-quality_ video...
>>>
>>>>> And there's a point to this feature?
>>>
>>> I would have thought it obvious, since Gooey enhancements is pretty
>>> much Vista's *only* selling point, and this video shows that XGL
>>> already wipes the floor with Aero.
>>>
>>
>> And also, since its rooted in OpenGL calls, works on a much, much
>> wider variety of hardware than Aero does.
>>
>> Whoops, looks like Linux supports more hardware than windows.
>
> ...Hardware, _as well as_ operating systems. Being 'compartmentalised', you
> could, in due time, fit Compix/XGL on top of OS X, BSD, etc.
It already works with BSD:
http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=39615
-----yttrx
--
http://www.yttrx.net
|
|
