__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 08:26 \__
> begin oe_protect.scr
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> __/ [ Larry Qualig ] on Friday 15 September 2006 22:51 \__
>>
>>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Friday 15 September 2006 18:11 \__
>>>>
>>>> > begin oe_protect.scr
>>>> > BearItAll <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>> >> Mathew P. wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thank you ladies and gentlemen. I look forward to awards
>>>> >>> night.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I thought I would start a fashion trend this year, I'll wear nothing
>>>> >> other than a bit a of bling.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I hope Hello mag wants an exclusive.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > It's Hello! magazine, not Hello :-) Or, you could try for OK!, or,
>>>> > there's Closer!, or Heat!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He could feature in page 3 of The Sun, but it'll probably take a lot of
>>>> estrogen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > You'd've thought that the net might've put an end to such stuff, or
>>>> > perhaps the proliferation of tv channels hosting magazine fluff aimed
>>>> > at girlies, but no... if anything, there're more than ever!
>>>> >
>>>> > I wonder of billwg!!! writes for one?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think he's been gone for a while. And Larry nymshifted back to the old
>>>> identity. Hadron Quark just wasn't to be...
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm absolutely 100% positive that you're talking out of your ass on
>>> this one. I have never posted as "Hadron Quark" and I'm most certain
>>> that Hadron didn't break into my Google account and post as me.
>>>
>>> But hey, why let little inconveniences like the truth get in the way of
>>> your far-fetched conspiracy theory. But then again, I'm sure that you
>>> have some proof or evidence to support your claim. You do, don't you?
>>
>> I was being sarcastic. Sorry about that, Larry. Didn't mean to annoy you
>> there, but rather make fun of "Hadron", whose /ad hominem/ attacks and bad
>> language won't be missed. You, on the other hand, are polite and
>> well-mannered, putting aside the Roy Culley incident.
>>
>
> And a few others, or are you referring to the mesgid incident?
I knew I was missing something. Judging by the reaction of others, one can
sometimes say a thing or two about posting history. The sheer number of
posts makes this an impossibility so the aggregated impression is a good
indicator.
To me at least, Larry has never been rude. But his intent and approach in
COLA participation strikes a nerve. He is, just as the stats have him
labelled, a Microsoft apologist. And I struggle to comprehend how or why
someone would defend such a vile, unethical, brutal and dishonest company.
Its 2 principal leaders very much refelect on the characteristic of the
company, so defending the company on a personal (per individual) level is
inexcusable as well. And I've heard enough bullying and arrogance stories...
it's a case of running over anyone who stands in your way -- an embodiment
of an extremist go-get-her culture.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | X-No-Archive: No. Stand behind what you say
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Load average (/proc/loadavg): 0.53 0.41 0.45 5/146 13915
http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative
|
|
