On 2006-09-29, Jim <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How in the fuck can Microsoft expect to be taken seriously when they
> stipulate in their EULAa that their software is NOT to be used in
> misison-critical or production environments because they won't warrant it
> for suitability for /any/ purpose? Is this not reason enough for IT buyers
> to look elsewhere for an IT solution that means the difference between
> LIFE and DEATH?
Just where is this magical "elsewhere" you think IT buyers can look? (Hint:
it isn't Sun or IBM...they have the same kind of restriction) (Further
hint: so does the GPL).
--
--Tim Smith
|
|
